Docmoates: Add explicit HU anchors before each entry heading

2026-09-15T16:37:56Z

Add explicit HU anchors before each entry heading

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:37, 15 September 2026
Line 10:		Line 10:

	== Issues ==		== Issues ==
			<span id="HU-016"></span>
	=== HU-016: Grade appeal response inbox is unmonitored; students explicitly told not to reply ===		=== HU-016: Grade appeal response inbox is unmonitored; students explicitly told not to reply ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 38:		Line 39:
	'''Notes.''' The student sent three follow-up emails over the weekend before the 8 AM exam. No evidence of monitored response to time-sensitive pre-exam questions.		'''Notes.''' The student sent three follow-up emails over the weekend before the 8 AM exam. No evidence of monitored response to time-sensitive pre-exam questions.

			<span id="HU-090"></span>
	=== HU-090: Recurring Change.org petitions across multiple class years ignored; institutional 'formal complaint process' response characterized as dismissive; pattern of institutional non-response to collective student advocacy ===		=== HU-090: Recurring Change.org petitions across multiple class years ignored; institutional 'formal complaint process' response characterized as dismissive; pattern of institutional non-response to collective student advocacy ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 65:		Line 67:
	'''Notes.''' The town hall response is particularly telling: Student H's dismissive characterization of the response suggests students find the town hall format inadequate for substantive program change. Cross-reference: {{HU\|HU-045}} (faculty and administration non-responsiveness), {{HU\|HU-067}} (EthicsPoint investigation closed inadequately), {{HU\|HU-068}} (AI cheating EthicsPoint response). The pattern of petition, then formal complaint referral, then town hall, then no change, documents an institutional loop that deflects rather than resolves collective student concerns.		'''Notes.''' The town hall response is particularly telling: Student H's dismissive characterization of the response suggests students find the town hall format inadequate for substantive program change. Cross-reference: {{HU\|HU-045}} (faculty and administration non-responsiveness), {{HU\|HU-067}} (EthicsPoint investigation closed inadequately), {{HU\|HU-068}} (AI cheating EthicsPoint response). The pattern of petition, then formal complaint referral, then town hall, then no change, documents an institutional loop that deflects rather than resolves collective student concerns.

			<span id="HU-163e"></span>
	=== HU-163e: The burden was shifted to the student through an appeals and makeup process requiring a Herzing IT ticket and weather documentation, for a failure not of his making; faculty acknowledged they cannot set up an additional exam ===		=== HU-163e: The burden was shifted to the student through an appeals and makeup process requiring a Herzing IT ticket and weather documentation, for a failure not of his making; faculty acknowledged they cannot set up an additional exam ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 93:		Line 96:
	'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-163}} (lead). Documented 2026-06-06. UPDATE (2026-07-17): in this same thread, after being routed to the appeals process, the reporting student stated he would submit another grade appeal, describing it as approximately his thirteenth in two terms for a Proctor U issue, and attributed part of the underlying scheduling pressure to Herzing not giving ample notice of clinical schedules. This is offered as corroborating context for the cumulative burden documented in this sub-issue and is not independently verified as an exact count. See also {{HU\|HU-182}} (a subsequent, separately documented pattern of chronic ProctorU exam-start delays).		'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-163}} (lead). Documented 2026-06-06. UPDATE (2026-07-17): in this same thread, after being routed to the appeals process, the reporting student stated he would submit another grade appeal, describing it as approximately his thirteenth in two terms for a Proctor U issue, and attributed part of the underlying scheduling pressure to Herzing not giving ample notice of clinical schedules. This is offered as corroborating context for the cumulative burden documented in this sub-issue and is not independently verified as an exact count. See also {{HU\|HU-182}} (a subsequent, separately documented pattern of chronic ProctorU exam-start delays).

			<span id="HU-164c"></span>
	=== HU-164c: Reported repeated misdirection to file a grade appeal that the reporter states was already open, including when she later raised the SAP and GPA problem ===		=== HU-164c: Reported repeated misdirection to file a grade appeal that the reporter states was already open, including when she later raised the SAP and GPA problem ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 120:		Line 124:
	'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-164}} (lead). Reported account, unverified. Documented 2026-06-06.		'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-164}} (lead). Reported account, unverified. Documented 2026-06-06.

			<span id="HU-165d"></span>
	=== HU-165d: Reported denial of the circumstances appeal submitted by the reporter to explain why the two validations were not completed before the intensive ended ===		=== HU-165d: Reported denial of the circumstances appeal submitted by the reporter to explain why the two validations were not completed before the intensive ended ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 147:		Line 152:
	'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-165}} (lead). The reporter is continuing to pursue documentation and additional options. Reported account, unverified. Documented 2026-06-06.		'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-165}} (lead). The reporter is continuing to pursue documentation and additional options. Reported account, unverified. Documented 2026-06-06.

			<span id="HU-166"></span>
	=== HU-166: Lead: the NSG524 grade-appeal email thread contains a direct conflict within the same thread ===		=== HU-166: Lead: the NSG524 grade-appeal email thread contains a direct conflict within the same thread ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 168:		Line 174:
	'''Notes.''' Appeal relates to NSG524 Mental Health Nursing Exam 1, 2026 Summer C, the June 6, 2026 weather-related exam failure documented in {{HU\|HU-163}}. Dr. Prashad references the extenuating circumstances process posted in the course. Bishop's first email also cited the technology test assignment as missing; the reporting student replied attaching the test. Added 2026-06-09. Parts: {{HU\|HU-166a}}, {{HU\|HU-166b}}, {{HU\|HU-166c}}. Cross-references: {{HU\|HU-163}} (NSG524 ProctorU weather exam failure; lead cluster), {{HU\|HU-163d}} (vendor-institution ping-pong and contradictory explanations), {{HU\|HU-163e}} (burden-shift to appeals and IT ticket as directed by Dr. Gombar).		'''Notes.''' Appeal relates to NSG524 Mental Health Nursing Exam 1, 2026 Summer C, the June 6, 2026 weather-related exam failure documented in {{HU\|HU-163}}. Dr. Prashad references the extenuating circumstances process posted in the course. Bishop's first email also cited the technology test assignment as missing; the reporting student replied attaching the test. Added 2026-06-09. Parts: {{HU\|HU-166a}}, {{HU\|HU-166b}}, {{HU\|HU-166c}}. Cross-references: {{HU\|HU-163}} (NSG524 ProctorU weather exam failure; lead cluster), {{HU\|HU-163d}} (vendor-institution ping-pong and contradictory explanations), {{HU\|HU-163e}} (burden-shift to appeals and IT ticket as directed by Dr. Gombar).

			<span id="HU-166a"></span>
	=== HU-166a: Conflicting appeal-status instructions delivered within the same email thread: Shannon Bishop told the reporting student the appeal was incomplete and required resubmission with IT documentation, while Dr. Raywattie Prashad stated in the same thread the appeal had already been advanced to the next level for processing ===		=== HU-166a: Conflicting appeal-status instructions delivered within the same email thread: Shannon Bishop told the reporting student the appeal was incomplete and required resubmission with IT documentation, while Dr. Raywattie Prashad stated in the same thread the appeal had already been advanced to the next level for processing ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 196:		Line 203:
	'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-166}} (lead). CONFIRMED from first-party email evidence. Documented 2026-06-09.		'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-166}} (lead). CONFIRMED from first-party email evidence. Documented 2026-06-09.

			<span id="HU-166b"></span>
	=== HU-166b: Shannon Bishop shifted her stated rationale for the IT communication requirement within the same thread: initially citing it as required appeal documentation, then citing it as needed for tracking purposes only after the reporting student replied that the issue was not technical ===		=== HU-166b: Shannon Bishop shifted her stated rationale for the IT communication requirement within the same thread: initially citing it as required appeal documentation, then citing it as needed for tracking purposes only after the reporting student replied that the issue was not technical ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 224:		Line 232:
	'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-166}} (lead). CONFIRMED from first-party email evidence. Documented 2026-06-09.		'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-166}} (lead). CONFIRMED from first-party email evidence. Documented 2026-06-09.

			<span id="HU-166c"></span>
	=== HU-166c: Herzing IT communication required as a blocking condition for an appeal about a non-technical weather and vendor failure, with no documented Herzing technical issue for the student to have raised with IT ===		=== HU-166c: Herzing IT communication required as a blocking condition for an appeal about a non-technical weather and vendor failure, with no documented Herzing technical issue for the student to have raised with IT ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
Line 252:		Line 261:
	'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-166}} (lead). CONFIRMED that the requirement was imposed; the appropriateness of its application in this context is the concern. Dr. Gombar also directed the reporting student to obtain a Herzing IT ticket (cross-ref {{HU\|HU-163e}}). Documented 2026-06-09.		'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU\|HU-166}} (lead). CONFIRMED that the requirement was imposed; the appropriateness of its application in this context is the concern. Dr. Gombar also directed the reporting student to obtain a Herzing IT ticket (cross-ref {{HU\|HU-163e}}). Documented 2026-06-09.

			<span id="HU-177"></span>
	=== HU-177: Institutional leadership gave contemporaneous, conflicting instructions on whether a grade appeal was required for the July 15, 2026 Exam II disruption documented in HU-175 ===		=== HU-177: Institutional leadership gave contemporaneous, conflicting instructions on whether a grade appeal was required for the July 15, 2026 Exam II disruption documented in HU-175 ===
	{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"		{\| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"

Docmoates: Herzing issue tracker: redacted article from the 306-issue tracker

2026-09-15T16:36:52Z

Herzing issue tracker: redacted article from the 306-issue tracker

Show changes

Herzing Issues: Academic Appeals and Due Process - Revision history

Docmoates: Add explicit HU anchors before each entry heading

Docmoates: Herzing issue tracker: redacted article from the 306-issue tracker