Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
XMethod Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Herzing Issues: Academic Integrity
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== HU-026c: The EthicsPoint case closed in seven days with a generic resolution; the organization could not access the Notion evidence === {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" ! style="width:14em" | Severity | Medium ! style="width:14em" | Status | CONFIRMED |- ! Issue type | Investigation Adequacy Concern ! Date added | 2026-04-30 (split 2026-06-06) |- ! Owner | colspan="3" | Senior Director Academic Operations |} '''Finding.''' The EthicsPoint report was filed September 18, 2025 and closed September 25, 2025 (seven days) with a generic resolution. The organization noted it was unable to access the Notion URL that held the primary evidence and asked for screenshots, indicating the central evidence repository may not have been fully reviewed before closure. '''Evidence.''' EthicsPoint closure dated September 25, 2025; the organization separately noted it could not access the Notion URL and requested screenshots. Source Group: Prelicensure Student Handbook 2026 (SICCED09255468); Defense Bundles 2026-04-29 / 2026-04-30. '''Reported statement.''' <blockquote>We were able to meet with the other party involved and address the concerns shared here.</blockquote> '''Standards.''' ACEN Standard 4 (integrity processes must be applied); 34 C.F.R. 602.16 (institutional complaint handling, relevant to accreditation review). A seven-day closure that did not access the primary evidence raises an investigation-adequacy concern. Lead: {{HU|HU-026}}. See {{HU|HU-067}} (investigation adequacy). '''Impact.''' If the central evidence was not reviewed before closing, the resolution rests on an incomplete record, which weakens any reliance on the outcome. '''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU|HU-026}} (lead). Split 2026-06-06. Cross-reference {{HU|HU-067}}. <span id="HU-027"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to XMethod Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
XMethod Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)