Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
XMethod Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Herzing Issues: Academic Appeals and Due Process
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== HU-164c: Reported repeated misdirection to file a grade appeal that the reporter states was already open, including when she later raised the SAP and GPA problem === {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" ! style="width:14em" | Severity | Medium ! Status | POSSIBLE |- ! Issue type | Misdirection to Re-file an Open Appeal (reported) ! Date added | 2026-06-06 |- ! Owner | colspan="3" | Herzing Academic Advising |} '''Finding.''' The reporter states that on more than one occasion she was told to file a grade appeal that she already had open. She states this happened in Week 3 of the disputed term, and again about three weeks after the appeal had already been approved, when she raised that her GPA had not been updated and that she had been placed on SAP. She states she was repeatedly told to address the matter by filing an appeal that was already filed and, by then, already approved. '''Evidence.''' Reporter Student I, Herzing Direct Entry MSN Facebook group, comment thread on [post link redacted], describing being told in Week 3 to file an appeal already open, and being told again, weeks after approval, to file a grade appeal to resolve the GPA and SAP issue. Source: Reporter Student I, Herzing Direct Entry MSN Facebook group, comment thread on [post link redacted]. '''Reported statement.''' The reporter states she was told she needed to file an appeal that she already had open, that she was told to address it with her advisor, that she called and emailed him, that he again told her to file a grade appeal, that she did so, and that it was already approved. '''Standards.''' Raises a concern under administrative-capability expectations (34 C.F.R. 668.14) and HLC Criterion 2.A (clear and reliable processes). Repeatedly directing a student to re-file an appeal that is already open or already decided indicates a tracking and communication breakdown. Recorded for review. Lead: {{HU|HU-164}}. '''Impact.''' If accurate, the misdirection delayed resolution of the GPA and SAP problem and compounded the reporter's time burden and frustration. '''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU|HU-164}} (lead). Reported account, unverified. Documented 2026-06-06. <span id="HU-165d"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to XMethod Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
XMethod Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)