Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
XMethod Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Herzing Issues: Faculty Instruction and Curriculum Design
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== HU-103b: Inconsistent instruction quality across cohorts, with some students receiving minimal lectures and being left to self-teach === {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" ! style="width:14em" | Severity | High ! Status | CONFIRMED |- ! Issue type | Inconsistent Instruction Quality / Faculty Evaluation ! Date added | 2026-05-05 (split 2026-06-06) |- ! Owner | colspan="3" | Dean of Nursing / Program Chair |} '''Finding.''' Per the tracker's evidence, students reported wide variation in instruction quality, with some faculty providing only brief lectures and leaving students to figure out the material while other cohorts reported adequate teaching, a variability consistent with a high turnover environment in which faculty quality is unpredictable and underperformance may not be addressed. '''Evidence.''' Student CB (October 20, 2024) described a few great professors and quite a few who put out a ten minute lecture and hope students figure it out. Student F (December 30, 2023) described the first cohort acting as guinea pigs. Anonymous member 261 (August 29, 2025) described the cohort as a disorganized disaster in the context of faculty quality. Source Group: Facebook Group Export (Volume 7). '''Reported statement.''' According to the tracker, Student CB said there were a few great professors and quite a few who put out a ten minute lecture and basically hoped students would figure it out on their own. '''Standards.''' ACEN Standard 5 (faculty must be evaluated and underperformance addressed). Students paying the same tuition receiving materially different instruction depending on assignment is a program quality concern. Lead: {{HU|HU-103}}. See {{HU|HU-077}} (self teaching expectation). '''Impact.''' Students who pay the same tuition receive materially different instructional experiences depending on which faculty member they are assigned, independent of their own effort. '''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU|HU-103}} (lead). Split 2026-06-06. <span id="HU-111"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to XMethod Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
XMethod Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)