Editing Herzing Issues: Faculty Instruction and Curriculum Design (section)

=== HU-091b: Faculty check-off policy violations during intensives caused fails; appeal granted a redo (Handle 1) ===
{| class="wikitable" style="width:100%"
! style="width:14em" | Severity
| Medium
! Status
| CONFIRMED
|-
! Issue type
| Faculty Policy Violation: Improper Conduct During Intensive Check-Offs
! Date added
| 2026-05-04 (split 2026-06-06)
|-
! Owner
| colspan="3" | Faculty / Clinical Coordinator
|}
'''Finding.''' Per the tracker's evidence, Handle 1 reported failing intensives due to instructor check off policy violations, including instructors interrupting check offs, an instructor on her phone missing check offs, and instructors asking questions during check offs; multiple students had the same problem and had to return, and Handle 1 appealed and was granted a redo on May 4, 2026.

'''Evidence.''' Handle 1: failed the first check off, which caused failing two classes, then appealed because instructors broke policy during check offs.

'''Reported statement.''' According to the tracker, Handle 1 described a head to toe check off in which instructors kept stopping the student, one instructor was on her phone and missed check offs, instructors asked questions during the check off itself, and a lot of people had the same problem and had to come back because of it.

'''Standards.''' ACEN Standard 5 (faculty competence and professionalism in evaluation); integrity of skills check offs. Lead: {{HU|HU-091}}. Compare {{HU|HU-040}} (intensive validation stamp dispute).

'''Impact.''' Handle 1 failed two classes due to instructor policy violations before a successful appeal; institutional harm occurred before corrective action was available.

'''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU|HU-091}} (lead). Appeal granted a redo. Split 2026-06-06.

<span id="HU-097"></span>