Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
XMethod Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Herzing Issues: Enrollment, Registration, and Billing
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== HU-164a: Reported automatic re-enrollment in a class while a grade appeal was open, which the reporter states was unnecessary (not a prerequisite or corequisite) and created exposure to being charged twice for the same class === {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" ! style="width:14em" | Severity | Medium ! Status | POSSIBLE |- ! Issue type | Automatic Re-enrollment During an Open Appeal (reported) ! Date added | 2026-06-06 |- ! Owner | colspan="3" | Herzing Academic Advising / Registrar |} '''Finding.''' The reporter states that, with a grade appeal open for a class, she was automatically re-enrolled in that same class for Term B. She states she raised a concern about being charged twice for the class if the appeal took longer than expected, and that her advisor agreed to look into backing her out while telling her not to engage in the class. She states the class was not a prerequisite or corequisite, so the immediate re-enrollment was unnecessary. '''Evidence.''' Reporter Student I, Herzing Direct Entry MSN Facebook group, comment thread on [post link redacted], describing automatic re-enrollment for Term B during an open appeal and her stated concern about a double charge. '''Reported statement.''' Reporter Student I stated that she had an open grade appeal for a class and was automatically re-enrolled in the same class for Term B, and that she raised concern about being charged twice for the class if the appeal took longer than expected. '''Standards.''' Raises a concern under the institution's enrollment, registration, and tuition policies and under administrative-capability expectations (34 C.F.R. 668.14): automatically re-enrolling a student in a course that is the subject of an open appeal, where the course is not a prerequisite or corequisite, can expose the student to duplicate tuition charges. Recorded for review, not as a finding. Lead: {{HU|HU-164}}. '''Impact.''' If accurate, the automatic re-enrollment set up the double-charge exposure that the reporter says later materialized. '''Notes.''' Sub-issue of {{HU|HU-164}} (lead). Reported account, unverified. Documented 2026-06-06. <span id="HU-164b"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to XMethod Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
XMethod Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)