Jump to content
Main menu
Main menu
move to sidebar
hide
Navigation
Main page
Recent changes
Random page
Help about MediaWiki
XMethod Wiki
Search
Search
Appearance
Create account
Log in
Personal tools
Create account
Log in
Pages for logged out editors
learn more
Contributions
Talk
Editing
Herzing Issues: Academic Integrity
(section)
Page
Discussion
English
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
Tools
Tools
move to sidebar
hide
Actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
View history
General
What links here
Related changes
Special pages
Page information
Appearance
move to sidebar
hide
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
=== HU-089: Faculty edited student discussion board post without consent === {| class="wikitable" style="width:100%" ! style="width:14em" | Severity | Medium ! style="width:14em" | Status | POSSIBLE |- ! Issue type | Faculty Editing Student Academic Work ! Date added | 2026-05-05 |- ! Owner | colspan="3" | Faculty / Academic Affairs / Program Chair |} '''Finding.''' According to the tracker, Student J posted a question, on May 6, 2024, asking whether it was permissible for a faculty member to edit a student's discussion post, and stated she had never had that experience before. According to the tracker, the responding comment associated this with Dr. Holland, who teaches A&P II, a prerequisite course. Whether faculty have authority to edit student-submitted academic work without consent is reported as a concern raising questions about academic record integrity and the authenticity of graded submissions. '''Evidence.''' [post link redacted], May 6, 2024. Student CQ response (May 7, 2024) asked what was edited and whether Student J had Dr. Holland; Student J confirmed she did. Source Group: Herzing Direct Entry MSN Facebook Group Export (Dec 2022 to May 2026), Exhaustive Line-by-Line Review, 34,887 lines, 1,350 posts, 14,112 comments, 8 passes (Volume 7). '''Reported statement.''' Student J asked whether it was normal for a teacher to edit a student's discussion post, said she had never had that experience before, and confirmed the faculty member involved was Dr. Holland. '''Standards.''' FERPA (20 U.S.C. Β§1232g): educational records, including student academic submissions, belong to the student; unauthorized modification may implicate FERPA. Academic integrity principles: graded student work must represent the student's own submission; faculty editing submitted work for grade raises authenticity concerns. If the discussion post is a graded assignment, editing it post-submission affects the graded record without documented institutional authority. '''Impact.''' If faculty are routinely editing student academic submissions without documentation or consent, graded records may not accurately reflect student performance. Students have a right to know what they submitted and what was graded. This is reported as a POSSIBLE issue pending verification of whether the post was graded, whether edits were documented, and institutional policy on faculty editing of student submissions. '''Notes.''' Single documented instance; requires institutional verification. Student J's expressed shock suggests this was not standard practice at other institutions she had attended. Dr. Holland teaches A&P II, a prerequisite course, so this may affect prerequisite coursework records. <span id="HU-106"></span>
Summary:
Please note that all contributions to XMethod Wiki may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see
XMethod Wiki:Copyrights
for details).
Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)